fastdogbrewing wrote:On a different note I find it really arrogant and selfish that so many people in this country are whining about how horrible our health care system is, or how ~15% of the population being uninsured(without a qualifier as to why they are uninsured) is such an unbelievably horribly thing. Lets look around at how many countries on this planet actually do have people dieing EVERY FUCKING DAY, not because their countries health care system only insures 85% of the population but because their country has NO FUCKING HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AT FUCKING ALL.
What is better - a system where currently 90% of our citizens are covered and doctors make the decision or adopt a system where 100% of all in the country are covered regardless of citizenship, but the care you receive will be subject to veto and/or delay by a federal health official? Sound like a magnet to attract even more non-citizens here and raise the cost and lower the quality across the board. And adding free abortions for all to the mix? And free Viagra pills? Where does it stop? I personally don't have the problem with abortion in the first 4 months, but man up, if you get a chick pregnant, pay for the damn abortion yourself. If the women's health is at risk due to the pregnancy or she was a victim of rape I have no problem helping her out if she can not provide for herself.
Our dilemma is that we currently cover 100% of everyone here - no one is denied health care coverage. One can walk into any emergency room in this country and receive care. But costs are spinning out of control, this is being abused in many places and it is not sustainable. You can adopt a system as currently proposed which will allow the government to begin to deny or ration coverage to get costs under control (and adding a new layer of cost at the same time). I think there is a better way.

