Gucci Pilot wrote:Yeah, you're right, we're pretty close on this. However, my friend from Florida still has a point. The 2nd Amendment does not include suitcase nukes as per case law and treaty agreements.
I laughed as I read my post on this point. Hyperbole, of course.
Gucci Pilot wrote:Again respectfully, I think that you might want to research more aspects of the Bill of Rights. Erosion of the 1st as many in the media during the Nixon administration complained, the NRA has lobbied on the 2nd, Texas on the 14th, the trial lawyers assoc of america for the 4th (close to home), etc have led us to where we have a argument over a pocket knife.
Fo sho' brotha. We've legislated ourselves into absurdity.
I'm no constitutional scholar, but it is a living document that requires constant interpretation to sustain itself.There is a tension between the world the framers lived in and our modern world, and that modern world keeps changing. We can't ignore this and read a 200 year old document literally and without context. A purely literal reading of any document is disastrous, otherwise my bible gives me the authority to stone my neighbor. However, we can over-contextualize ourselves into a debate over pocketknives and render the document meaningless and impotent. There lies the tension, and that's what keeps this shit interesting. I don't know the answer, but like you I know right from wrong and I'm sure going to speak up when I need to.
:gets off soapbox:
Anyhoo, I've been drinking and now it's time for bed. Night all.







